| Does upstream `rp2040js` emulate the CYW43439? | **No.** Open issue [#134](https://github.com/wokwi/rp2040js/issues/134) ("Is there a way to emulate cyw43 using nodejs?") sits unanswered since it was opened. There is no PR, no branch, no design draft. |
| Does Wokwi emulate Pico W WiFi today? | **Yes**, but the CYW43 model is **closed-source** and lives server-side together with the rest of the Wokwi network stack. Only the bare RP2040 core (`rp2040js`) is open. |
| Is there any community emulator? | **No.** Every CYW43 project we found is the *opposite direction* — host-side drivers (`georgerobotics/cyw43-driver`, `embassy-rs/cyw43`, `soypat/cyw43439`, `iosoft/picowi`) that talk to *real* silicon. None is an emulator of the chip. |
| Is the protocol documented well enough to build one? | **Mostly yes.** The gSPI bus is described in the Infineon datasheet and re-implemented in three open-source drivers. The 224 KB firmware blob is *not* — it is a closed binary loaded into the chip, but for emulation purposes we don't need to run it; we only need to **answer the host driver as if it had executed**. |
| Reasonable scope for Velxio? | **Yes, in tiers** (see [04_emulation_design.md](./04_emulation_design.md)). Tier 0 (handshake-only stub) is doable in days. Tier 2 (DHCP + TCP via slirp) is comparable in size to the existing ESP32 path. |
## What's in this folder
```
00_README.md ← this file
01_velxio_current_state.md ← what Velxio actually does today on Pico W
02_rp2040js_inventory.md ← what rp2040js exposes that we'd hook into
03_cyw43_bus_protocol.md ← gSPI command word, registers, magic values
04_emulation_design.md ← layered plan from stub → full WiFi
05_existing_implementations.md ← every CYW43 codebase we found, classified
06_firmware_blob_question.md ← can we ship the 224 KB blob? legal/practical
07_open_questions.md ← decisions we cannot make from research alone
sources.md ← canonical URLs, dated 2026-04-28
```
The companion folder `../test_code/` contains runnable prototypes that